Don't let them get hopes up when mentioning the Vermont, New Hampshire and Texas Nationalist movements. These are debased and liberal thinking kinds of secession groups. It's startling and a shock of revelation but they do what Yankees and their converts always have--condemn Dixie for racism (an 1861 war tactic) and gather to themselves all of Babylon and its people. These are dangerous groups to the Cause and a Christian Confederacy.

They believe they can do the Empire which destroyed Dixie and America in better form but locally. Also, any secessionist getting media limelight and coverage are their boys and their writers.

From the article: "The League of the South is also a perpetual source of heartburn for Naylor--the retro-Confederate group insists on singing Dixie at meetings and has a strange obsession with returning American spelling to its traditional Southern roots. By contrast, Naylor likes what he sees out of the Texas Nationalist Movement. That independence-espousing organization doesn't appear to be racist, homophobic, or violent, Naylor says, though on the last count 'you can never be sure.'"

Gary
__________

How Is America Going To End? Who's most likely to secede?
http://www.lewrockwell.com/spl/breaking-up-centralized-us.html
http://www.slate.com/id/2224104/pagenum/2/
By Josh Levin, Posted Wednesday, Aug. 5, 2009, at 7:02 AM ET

(Continued from page 1) In the American end times, our government will take one of two forms. One possibility is that federalism will give way to an all-powerful central government. (In yesterday's global-warming thought experiment, this was the climate strongman scenario.) The other option is decentralization – in the absence of a unifying national interest, the United States of America will fragment and be supplanted by regional governance. ...

 out of  found this valuable. Do you find this valuable?    

Sly, Grinding, Selfish and Tricking People:

"I heard an Englishman, who had been long resident in America, declare that in the following, in meeting, or in overtaking, in the street, on the road, or in the field, at the theatre, the coffee-house, or the home, he had never overheard Americans conversing without the word DOLLAR being pronounced between them. Such unity of purpose, such sympathy of feeling, can, I believe, be found nowhere else, except perhaps in an ant's nest.

The result is exactly what might be anticipated. This sordid object, forever before their eyes, must inevitiably produce a sordid tone of mind, and, worse still, it produces a seared and blunted conscience on all questions of probity. I know not a more striking evidence of the low tone of morality which is generated by this universal pursuit of money than the manner in which the New England States are described by Americans. All agree in saying that they present a spectacle of industry and prosperity delightful to behold, and this is the district and the population most constantly quoted as the finest specimen of their admirable country; yet I never met a single individual in any part of the Union who did not paint these New Englanders as sly, grinding, selfish, and tricking.

The Yankees (as the New Englanders are called) will avow these qualities themselves with a complacent smile, and boast that no people on earth can match them in over-reaching in a bargain. I have heard them unblushingly relate stories of their cronies and friends, which, if believed among us, would banish the heroes from the fellowship of honest men forever...yet the Americans declare that "they are the most moral persons on earth." (America Through British Eyes, Allan Nevins, editor, Oxford University Press, 1948, pp. 136-137)

 out of  found this valuable. Do you find this valuable?